When I received the letter from the district court of initiating
legal incapacitation proceedings on 30/07/2009 afternoon,
this was a big shock for me.Because I had a business degree with Jura bills, I knew
immediately what it would mean a possible legal guardian for me.
The letter did not include the real reason for the initiation of
the proceeding. There stood only "at the suggestion of the
district office".
Because I had recently to do with the District Office /
construction and trade, I suspected immediately that department
and complained about by phone.
Then I realized that I need a lawyer immediately. After several
phone calls, I wrote about after 2 hours of the letter arrival
the first email to an unknown lawyer with the request for legal
representation.
In retrospect, it was completely the wrong lawyer for me.
On Monday afternoon I visited him for a maximum of half an hour,
then I was outside and shocked again by his behaviour.
Later he ignored my written hints on the context to the
construction and commercial law in my case. He also ignored my
email that he should take actions against the police report.
Therefore, in October 2009, I wrote my first complaint in my
life, unfortunately without success. (85 Js 9229/09). The
complaint also contained documents as evidence of the
relationship with the Construction Law and Commercial of my
neighbours.
Only a year later the district administration confirmed against
lawyer Anwalt 3 that the trade of my neighbours had allegedly
not approved.
From the circumstances here, can prove certain that this could
not be the case. Municipality Binzen and the mayor knew about,
and in accordance with the subsequent conduct by the district
office was clear that the trade was tolerated since 2005.
Now after more than 7 years, I think it is not excluded that
lawyer Anwalt 1 belongs to relationship system of my neighbours
Nachbarn-X.
2012, I heard that he has successfully initiated a
criminal case against a lawyer for defamation.
Before that, I thought that he was not versed in criminal law
and other fields has. He lives in the same village as the
opposing lawyer.
On the following Monday (03/08/2016) I learned about the access
to the case files of the district court that the police report
has triggered the process.
The contents of this report were the next shock for me.
Until this date, evidences has been denied in my favour for me.
Therefore, it is undisputed that I must suffer from State
Psychoterror for over 7 years. Living with incapacitation
casefiles caused by false statements, is an indescribable
humiliation.
Also it is an indescribable humiliation, that my neighbours have
many legal successes with their false statements against me.
Since the doorways are only a few meters away, there are often
personal encounters with visual contact.
Attachment L contains an actual letter to the municipality
Binzen and to the District Office Loerrach, which again
illustrates the construction and trade law context, namely
obvious concessions to my neighbours Nachbarn-X.
When I am in 2009 pointed out in the morning,
Nachbarin-X
made the statements to the police the afternoon.
I see this as an act of revenge by
Nachbarin-X against me.
G. Moser |
