Zurück Menü

Blinde,
weinende
Justitia
  
Albtraum: Gerichtliches Betreuungsverfahren und die Folgen.  Deutschlands erfolgreichste Mobbingmethode mit Staatshilfe.
Gesetzesänderungen sind hier dringend notwendig
!
Ab 10.01.2012 online: www.gerichtlichesbetreuungsverfahren.de
Wie aus einer Mücke ein Elefant wurde ! - Mit Kanonen auf Spatzen schießen! (AG Lörrach)
Wie Nachbarin-X, Polizei, Landratsamt, Amtsgericht u.a. mich in den Tod treiben dürfen!

Startseite - Home
Vorgeschichte
Mathematik-Lexikon
Verfahrensbeginn
Zeitl. Reihenfolge
Ereignisse 2017 ab Juli
Ereignisse 2017 bis 6
Ereignisse 2016 ab 7
Ereignisse 2016 bis 6
Ereignisse 2015
Ereignisse  2014
Ereignisse  2013
Ereignisse 2012
Ereignisse  2011
Ereignisse 2010
Ereignisse  2009
Nachbarin-X
Nachbar X
Nachbarn X
Belastungen
Aktenberg !!!
Kosten
Polizei
Landratsamt  Bau
Landratsamt Sozial
Amtsgericht
Landgericht
Oberlandesgericht
Einzelpetition 2013
Petitionen
Verwaltungsgericht
Staatsanwaltschaft
Europ. Gerichtshof
European Court
Prozessbetrug ?
Datenschutzbehörde
Anwälte
Anwaltskammer
Verfahrensfehler
Keine Zeugen
Betreuung für ...
"psychisch krank"
Stigmatisierung
Heile Welt !!??
Rechtsschutz
Humor
Staatl. Informationen
Hunde
Weinende Justitia
Bestattungsvorsorge
Impressum


Denied from the European Court (Sep 2016)


This Website contains a detailed Case showing the unfair Rules on German Incapacitation Procedures.
In English here is a Short Version in the Form of a rejected Express Application to the European Court of Human Rights.
This Case shows many Violations of the European Convention on Human Rights and is still unsuccessful.
This case also shows that inactive, misbehaving and deceiving lawyers make an effective complaint impossible to the European Court.

Note that I have created the translation under time pressure.
Therefore mistakes and still German words are contained.

   

Part 1
 
I.
 
Justifications of the request
 
  1. Legal protection against foreclosure,
otherwise the false statements of the opposite party will be rewarded.
 
    a) The following German incapacitation laws. More...
 
    b) Idle, fraudulent and incorrect working lawyers
The justice partly knew of deception in my case. More...
 
    c) Unsuccessful individual petition in March 2013 to the Petitions Committee in the Land Baden-Württemberg (Original and "fake" online:
(www.gerichtlichesbetreuungsverfahren.de/petitionbw-2013.htm) More...
 
    d) Initiation of criminal proceedings due to threats against me in Summer 2013 More...
 
    e) Unsuccessful court proceedings without the right to witnesses and without the right to evidence of the false statements in the police report.  More...
 
    f) Unsuccessful criminal charges for false statements from neighbour Nachbarin-X.
(See online: Button "Staatsanwaltschaft")
www.gerichtlichesbetreuungsverfahren.de/staatsanwalt.htm More...
 
    g) No experiences with the police, the courts and the public prosecutor. Since 2009 many Case numbers More...
 
  2. Under national law, there is no Help for me expected  More...
 
Part 2
 
II.
 
Expansion of my Application
Possible motive of my neighbours

More Applications
 

  1. I want to get evidences against the false statements in the police report of 2009
 
  2. Determine if my complaint against Nachbarin-X in 2009 by the prosecution Lörrach (CFN 85 Js 9229/09) was wrongly rejected.
 
  3.  I want evidences against the false statements in the warning letter and criminal proceedings for threat (CFN 86 Js 7931/13 prosecutor Lörrach (CFN 86 Js 7931/13 Staatsanwaltschaft Lörrach) ) against me in 2013
 
  4. Evidence against the false statements of Nachbarin-X
 
  5. Determining that the Petitions Committee has not worked in the state parliament of Baden-Württemberg my numbered petition by his policies and slandered me by publishing his petition on the internet version.
This petition Version filed against me by the police and the District Office Loerrach the Verwaltungsgericht Freiburg and accepted.
 
  6. I need help and protection by the European Court against another unjust measures, such as reinitiate such a procedure without sufficient reason.
 
  7. I request that the Court, after examining my documents,
namely the current and any other documents,
the Federal Republic of Germany forces,
adapt the German incapacitation laws of the European Convention on Human Rights.
 
  8. Claim for just Satisfaction
 
  9. If a lawyer for the European Court is imperative neccessary .....
   
Part 3 Attachments 2.2 to 2.6
   
Part 4 Attachments 2.7 to 2.9
 

Attachment 3

   
Part 5 Attachment 2, Attachment 3 and Attachment5
   
Part 6 Attachment L, Attachment 6, Attachment 7
   
Part 7 Attachment 8, Attachment 9, Attachment 10

European Court 1 European Court 2 European Court 3 European Court 4 European Court 5 European Court 6 European Court 7


Amal Murkus - Nuur El Ab
*Slide Show* for the song "Nuur El Ab" نور الاب
Singer : Amal Murkus, Song : " Nuur El Ab "
Veröffentlicht am 05.03.2010 von
Yara Zreik https://youtu.be/Cdllb7Tm2qc


Geändert am:   09.11.2017

Impressum

Startseite:  www.gerichtlichesbetreuungsverfahren.de