Denied from the European Court (Sep 2016)
|
This Website contains a detailed Case showing the unfair Rules on German
Incapacitation Procedures.
In English here is a Short Version in the Form of a rejected
Express Application to the European Court of Human Rights.
This Case shows many Violations of the European Convention on Human
Rights and is still unsuccessful.
This case also shows that
inactive, misbehaving and deceiving lawyers make an effective complaint
impossible to the European Court.Note that I have created the translation
under time pressure.
Therefore mistakes and still German words are contained.
|
Part 1
|
I.
|
Justifications of the request
|
|
|
1. |
Legal protection against foreclosure,
otherwise the false statements of the opposite party will be rewarded.
|
|
|
|
a) |
The following German incapacitation laws.
More...
|
|
|
|
b) |
Idle, fraudulent and
incorrect working lawyers
The justice partly knew of deception in my case.
More...
|
|
|
|
c) |
Unsuccessful
individual petition in March 2013 to the Petitions Committee in
the Land Baden-Württemberg (Original and "fake" online:
(www.gerichtlichesbetreuungsverfahren.de/petitionbw-2013.htm)
More...
|
|
|
|
d) |
Initiation of criminal
proceedings due to threats against me in Summer 2013
More...
|
|
|
|
e) |
Unsuccessful court
proceedings without the right to witnesses and without the right
to evidence of the false statements in the police report.
More...
|
|
|
|
f) |
Unsuccessful criminal
charges for false statements from neighbour
Nachbarin-X.
(See
online: Button "Staatsanwaltschaft")
www.gerichtlichesbetreuungsverfahren.de/staatsanwalt.htm
More...
|
|
|
|
g) |
No experiences with
the police, the courts and the public prosecutor. Since 2009
many Case numbers
More...
|
|
|
2. |
Under national law, there
is no Help for me expected
More...
|
Part
2
|
II.
|
Expansion of my Application
Possible motive of my neighboursMore
Applications
|
|
|
1. |
I want to get evidences against
the false statements in the police report of 2009
|
|
|
2. |
Determine if my complaint against
Nachbarin-X in 2009 by the prosecution Lörrach (CFN 85 Js
9229/09) was wrongly rejected.
|
|
|
3. |
I want evidences against the
false statements in the warning letter and criminal proceedings
for threat (CFN 86 Js 7931/13 prosecutor Lörrach (CFN 86 Js
7931/13 Staatsanwaltschaft Lörrach) ) against me in 2013
|
|
|
4. |
Evidence against the false
statements of Nachbarin-X
|
|
|
5. |
Determining that the
Petitions Committee has not worked in the state parliament of
Baden-Württemberg my numbered petition by his policies and
slandered me by publishing his petition on the internet version.
This petition Version filed against me by the police and the
District Office Loerrach the Verwaltungsgericht Freiburg and
accepted.
|
|
|
6. |
I need help and protection by
the European Court against another unjust measures, such as
reinitiate such a procedure without sufficient reason.
|
|
|
7. |
I request that the Court,
after examining my documents,
namely the current and any other documents,
the Federal Republic of Germany forces,
adapt the German incapacitation laws of the European Convention
on Human Rights.
|
|
|
8. |
Claim for just Satisfaction
|
|
|
9. |
If a lawyer for the European
Court is imperative neccessary ..... |
|
|
|
|
Part 3 |
Attachments 2.2 to 2.6 |
|
|
|
|
Part 4 |
Attachments 2.7 to 2.9 |
|
|
Attachment 3 |
|
|
|
|
Part 5 |
Attachment 2, Attachment 3 and Attachment5 |
|
|
|
|
Part 6 |
Attachment L, Attachment 6, Attachment 7 |
|
|
|
|
Part
7 |
Attachment 8, Attachment 9, Attachment 10 |
